FWłaściwości functional properties andkcjonalne i aktywność biological activities of plant-derived polyphenolic compounds have gained great interest due to theirzna związków polifenolowych pochodzenia roślinnego zyskały duże zainteresowanie ze względu na ich udowodnione epidemiologically proven health benefits and diverse industrial applications in the food and phznie korzyści zdrowotne oraz różnorodne zastosowania przemysłowe w przemyśle spożywczym i farmaceutical industryycznym. MPoreover, the food processing conditions and certainnadto warunki przetwarzania żywności i pewne reakcje chemical reactions such aszne, takie jak pigmentationcja, acylationcja, hydroxylation, and glycosylation can also cause alteration in theksylacja i glikozylacja, mogą również powodować zmiany w stability, antioxidant activity, and structural characteristics of the polyphenolicności, aktywności przeciwutleniającej i właściwościach strukturalnych związków polifenolowych. cPompounds. Since the (poly)phenols are highly reactive, to overcome thesenieważ (poli)fenole są wysoce reaktywne, aby przezwyciężyć te problems, they, skutecznym podejściem jest formulation of a complex of polyphenolic compounds with łowanie kompleksu związków polifenolowych z naturalnymi biopolymers is an effectiveimerami. apprPoach. Besides, to increase the bioavailability and bioaccessibility of polyphenolic compounds, milk proteins such as whey protein cnadto, aby zwiększyć biodostępność i biodostępność związków polifenolowych, białka mleka, takie jak koncentrate, sodium caseinate, and białka serwatki, kazeinian sodu, milk porotein caz koncentrate act as białka mleka działają jak natural vehicles, due to their specific structural and functional properties with high nutritional valuene nośniki, ze względu na swoje specyficzne właściwości strukturalne i funkcjonalne o wysokiej wartości odżywczej. ThDlaterefore, milk proteins are suitable for the delivery of polyphenols to parts of the gastrointestinal tractgo białka mleka nadają się do dostarczania polifenoli do części przewodu pokarmowego.
1. Introduction
(Poly)phenolic compounds are phytochemicals that occur naturally within plant cells
1. Wstęp
Związki (poli)fenolowe to fitochemikalia, które naturalnie występują w komórkach roślinnych, a składniki te mają potencjał poprawy zdrowia człowieka [1]. Zostało dobrze zbadane, że składniki bioaktywne obejmują kilka związków, takich jak flawonoidy, alkaloidy, antybiotyki i kwasy fenolowe, które można uzyskać z różnych części roślin [2]. (poli)fenole odgrywają kluczową rolę w diecie człowieka ze względu na ich niezwykłe właściwości terapeutyczne i doskonałe właściwości biologiczne. Co więcej, w ciągu ostatnich lat ludzie skłaniali się ku naturalnym składnikom żywności, dlatego naukowcy zbadali potencjalne korzyści zdrowotne ekstraktów pochodzenia roślinnego, które są często wykorzystywane jako niezbędny składnik w żywności i produktach nutraceutycznych. Z punktu widzenia nauk o żywności (poli)fenole są istotnymi składnikami, które odpowiadają za właściwości organoleptyczne i przeciwutleniające żywności oraz wpływają na ogólne cechy jakościowe żywności [3]. Ponadto (poli)fenole często dają efekt osłonowy, chroniący rośliny przed czynnikami środowiskowymi i fizjologicznymi [4,
and these components have the potential to improve human health [1]. It has been well studied that bioactive components include several compounds such as flavonoids, alkaloids, antibiotics, and phenolic acids, which can be obtained from different parts of the plants [2]. (poly)phenolics play a major key role in the human diet due to their remarkable therapeutical and excellent biological properties. Furthermore, over the past years, people have been moving towards natural food ingredients, and thus, researchers explored the potential health benefits of plant-derived extracts, and these extracts are often utilized as a vital ingredient in food and nutraceutical products. From a food science perspective, (poly)phenols are vital components that are responsible for the organoleptic and antioxidant properties of food and influence the overall quality attributes of the food [3]. Moreover, (poly)phenols frequently generate a shielding effect to protect the plants from environmental and physiological factors [4][5]. Despite the easy accessibility, availability, and low toxicity of (poly)phenolic compounds, low bioavailability, and rapid metabolism limit the effective utilization of (poly)phenolic compounds [6]. Environmental factors including sunlight, temperature, pH, and oxygen can cause epimerization of bioactive components, which directly limits the utilization of (poly)phenolic components in food materials [7]. Furthermore, the food processing conditions and certain chemical reactions such as pigmentation, acylation, hydroxylation, and glycosylation can also cause an alteration in the stability, antioxidant activity, and structural characteristics of the (poly)phenolic compounds [8]. Since the (poly)phenols are highly reactive, to overcome these problems, the formulation of a complex of (poly)phenolic compounds with natural biopolymers is an effective approach [7]. Over the past years, scientists have reported the enhanced bioactivity and functionalization of (poly)phenolic complexes and among all-natural biopolymers, milk proteins are excessively studied and effectively used for the formulation of a stable complex with several (poly)phenolic compounds. The interactions of (poly)phenols with milk proteins such as sodium caseinate, milk protein concentrate, and whey protein concentrate primarily show hydrogen bonding, hydrophobic interactions, and covalent bonds with other molecules [9]. However, the interactions between milk proteins and another molecule significantly show a great impact on the structure and concentration of (poly)phenols and proteins with alterations in pH, temperature, and ionic strength [10]. The structural and functional properties of the milk proteins may change due to the interaction of (poly)phenols with milk proteins. Therefore, for the formulation of the milk protein-(poly)phenols composites, the mechanism of the interactions of (poly)phenols with milk proteins is important [11]. Moreover, milk proteins effectively help to release the appropriate health-relevant dose of (poly)phenols to the gastrointestinal tract and due to this process, the bioavailability and bio-accessibility of the (poly)phenolic compound also increase [12].
5]. Pomimo łatwej dostępności, dostępności i niskiej toksyczności związków (poli)fenolowych, niska biodostępność i szybki metabolizm ograniczają efektywne wykorzystanie związków (poli)fenolowych [6 ]. Czynniki środowiskowe, w tym światło słoneczne, temperatura, pH i tlen, mogą powodować epimeryzację składników bioaktywnych, co bezpośrednio ogranicza wykorzystanie składników (poli)fenolowych w materiałach spożywczych [7]. Ponadto warunki przetwarzania żywności i niektóre reakcje chemiczne, takie jak pigmentacja, acylacja, hydroksylacja i glikozylacja, mogą również powodować zmianę stabilności, aktywności przeciwutleniającej i właściwości strukturalnych związków (poli)fenolowych [8]. Ponieważ (poli)fenole są wysoce reaktywne, aby przezwyciężyć te problemy, skutecznym podejściem jest formułowanie kompleksu związków (poli)fenolowych z naturalnymi biopolimerami [7]. W ciągu ostatnich lat naukowcy donosili o zwiększonej bioaktywności i funkcjonalizacji kompleksów (poli)fenolowych, a wśród całkowicie naturalnych biopolimerów białka mleka są nadmiernie badane i skutecznie wykorzystywane do formułowania stabilnego kompleksu z kilkoma związkami (poli)fenolowymi. Oddziaływania (poli)fenoli z białkami mleka, takimi jak kazeinian sodu, koncentrat białka mleka i koncentrat białka serwatki, wykazują przede wszystkim wiązania wodorowe, oddziaływania hydrofobowe i kowalencyjne z innymi cząsteczkami [ 9]. Jednak interakcje między białkami mleka a inną cząsteczką wykazują istotny wpływ na strukturę i stężenie (poli)fenoli i białek przy zmianach pH, temperatury i siły jonowej [10]. Właściwości strukturalne i funkcjonalne białek mleka mogą ulec zmianie w wyniku interakcji (poli)fenoli z białkami mleka. Dlatego przy formułowaniu kompozytów białka mleka z (poli)fenolami ważny jest mechanizm oddziaływania (poli)fenoli z białkami mleka [11]. Ponadto białka mleka skutecznie pomagają uwolnić odpowiednią dla zdrowia dawkę (poli)fenoli do przewodu pokarmowego, a dzięki temu procesowi wzrasta również biodostępność i biodostępność związku (poli)fenolowego [12]. Dlatego w tym przeglądzie omówiliśmy różne szkodliwe skutki dla związków (poli)fenolowych pochodzenia roślinnego. Dodatkowo omówiono możliwe mechanizmy oddziaływania składników (poli)fenolowych z białkiem mleka. Szczegółowo omówiono wpływ interakcji na funkcjonalność i stabilność (poli)fenoli oraz zmiany strukturalne białka mleka. Szczegółowo omówiono również zastosowanie opracowanego kompleksu i metod do analizy oddziaływań wiązania między (poli)fenolami – białkami mleka, takich jak ultrafiltracja, kalorymetria izotermicznego miareczkowania, dokowanie molekularne.
2. (Poly)phenolic Compounds
Plant-based food contains many important micro and macro components for the growth, development, and health of human beings [13]. These compounds are heterogeneous in nature and consist of phenolic acids, stilbenes, lignans, and flavonoids [14]. Factors such as the release of bioactive compounds from plant material, solubility, passage across intestinal epithelial cells, as well as chemical and enzymatic reactions occurring in the gastrointestinal tract are affected by bioavailability [15]. The secondary metabolites, bioactive compounds, are a good source of nutritional value with interesting biological activities in plant-based foods and mainly occur in the presence of (poly)phenols. Alkaloids, flavonoids, stilbenes, lignans, phenolic acids, and others are different kinds of bioactive compounds present in plants. The major group of secondary metabolites we found is mostly (poly)phenolic compounds. Some of the plant-based foods in which (poly)phenol compounds can be found are fruits, vegetables, coffee, tea, wine, cereal grains, and berries [16]. (Poly)phenols are categorized into three parts, as shown in Figure 1. Gallic acid is the most common example of hydroxybenzoic acid, and ferulic acid is considered a hydroxycinnamic acid. Additionally, Phenolic acids are simple phenols that contain a carboxyl group and occur mainly as hydroxybenzoic (C6-C1 skeleton) and hydroxycinnamic acids (C6-C3 skeleton), which derive from benzoic or cinnamic acid, respectively [17]. Herein, hydroxycinnamic acid compounds occur most frequently as simple esters with hydroxy carboxylic acids or glucose, while the hydroxybenzoic acid compounds are present mainly in the form of glucosides, whereas chemically flavonoids are based on a fifteen-carbon skeleton consisting of two benzene rings linked via a heterocyclic pyrene ring [9]. However, non-flavonoids mainly consist of stilbenes, phenolic acids, and tannins, and tannins can be further divided into gallotannin, ellagitannin, hydrolyzed and condensed tannin, and so on. The basic structural difference between these classes is that non-flavonoids contain only one phenol ring and flavonoids contain two phenol rings [18].
Figure 1. Classification of (poly)phenols.
2.1. Types of (Poly)phenols
These (poly)phenols are divided into different groups based on the function of the phenolic rings, which present these structural elements and bind the rings to each other. Generally, (poly)phenolic compounds are classified into three major groups: (I) flavonoids (II) phenolic acids, and (III) non-flavonoids.
2.1.1. Flavonoids
Flavonoids are the major group of (poly)phenolic compounds that occur naturally. Based on their chemical components, they are present in six different subgroups, i.e., flavanols, flavones, isoflavones, anthocyanin, flavanones, and chalcone. Flavonoids contain a three-ring structure with multiple replacements, and thus, due to their structural composition, their molecular weight is very low, as shown in Figure 2. [19]. An extensive range of pharmacological functions in addition to antioxidant, antibacterial, hepatoprotective, and anti-inflammatory effects are present in flavonoids [20]. These flavonoids represent a basic structure of two phenyl groups linked with three-carbon atoms, which generally form with oxygen and are linked with glycosidic linkage. In many conditions, there are three or more hydroxyl groups linked to the structure of the backbone [21].
Figure 2. Classification and molecular structures with the examples of common plant-derived flavonoids.
2.1.2. Phenolic Acids
Different types of phenolic acids are commonly available in fruits and vegetables, whereas bound phenolic acids are present in grains and their derivatives [22]. The phenolic acids can be divided into two groups: cinnamic acid and benzoic acids. Cinnamic acid consists of nine (C6-C3) carbon atoms which are also known as phenylpropanoids [23], and benzoic acid contains seven (C6-C1) carbon atoms. Moreover, they exist mostly as hydroxycinnamic and hydroxybenzoic acids, which are available either in conjugated or free forms, as shown in Figure 3. In addition, hydroxycinnamic acids such as P-coumaric acid (C9H8O3), ferulic acid (C10H10O4), sinapic acid (C11H12O5), gallic acid (C7H6O5), and salicylic acid (C7H6O3) are also abundantly available in different types of foods (Figure 4). These acids also show radical scavenging activity to stabilize the resulting phenoxyl radicals within their structure by donating electrons. [24]. Furthermore, hydroxybenzoic acid (4-HBA) can be utilized to formulate value-added bioproducts that have great potential application in the pharmacy, food, and agricultural pesticide industries. Besides, ellagic acid, mostly available in cranberries, blueberries, strawberries, and blackberries, shows potential effects that decrease high blood cholesterol, maintain blood pressure, and smooth skin wrinkles from radiation. Gallic acid is mostly known for its antioxidant effect and is available in mango, soy, and tea [25].
Figure 3. Chemical structure of different types of phenolic acids (hydroxycinnamic acids are hydroxy metabolites with a C6-C3 backbone, and hydroxybenzoic acid is a monohydroxy benzoic acid carrying a hydroxy substituent at C4 of the benzene ring).
Figure 4. Chemical structure of gallic (hydroxy group at 3rd, 4th, and 5th position), salicylic (hydroxy group at ortho position), ferulic (hydroxy group at 3rd and 4th position on phenyl ring), and coumaric acids (hydroxy group at 4th position on phenyl ring).
2.1.3. Non-Flavonoids
Tannins, stilbenes, xanthones, and lignans are considered as the non-flavonoid phenolic group. Most of these phenolic compounds contain at least two aromatic rings in their structure, whereas tannins contain more than two aromatic rings in their structure. However, lignans are vascular plant’s secondary metabolites; with a wide range of functional properties, these are derived from the combination of two cinnamic acid units of C6-C3 in β-carbon atoms, which are linked with an additional lactone or ether bond [19]. Stilbenes are also non-flavonoid compounds that are present in almonds, beans, blueberries, peanuts, and wine, respectively [26].
2.2. Extraction Process
Currently, several techniques including the solvent extraction method, liquid-liquid extraction method (LLE), pressurized liquid extraction method (PLE), ultrasonic-assisted extraction method (UAE), microwave-assisted extraction method (MAE), and supercritical fluid extraction method (SFE) have been exploited to extract secondary metabolites (polyphenols) from various sources [27]. However, liquid-liquid extraction and solid-liquid extraction techniques are effectively used for the extraction of (poly)phenols. Moreover, various factors such as chemical structure, time duration, type of solvent, and the polarity of compounds always play a key role in the extraction of (poly)phenolics. Several studies also suggested that stabilizers can be used during the extraction of (poly)phenols to retain effective functional properties [28]. Some suitable solvents, such as alcohol, methanol, and ethanol, are used for the extraction of (poly)phenols from natural sources [12]. Furthermore, the purity of (poly)phenols, yield, and variation in rate is highly dependent upon the extraction techniques. Although solvent-based extraction produces larger yields, it restricts the use of (poly)phenols for human consumption. (Poly)phenols must be purified further after solvent extraction, either through the membrane or ultrafiltration. Thus, to avoid degradation, the solvent extraction method was devised to separate soluble chemicals from a solid matrix (plant tissue) using a liquid matrix (solvent) at a lower temperature. The choice of solvent, together with heating and/or agitation, is critical for the solvent extraction of bioactive chemicals and antioxidants from plant materials [24]. The use of different solvents leads to a change in the composition of the extract. Besides, the effects of extraction time and temperature also influence the total (poly)phenol content and antioxidant activity of tea leaves [29].
2.3. Factors Causing Detrimental Effects on the Bioactivity of (Poly)phenols
(Poly)phenolic extracts are “generally recognized as safe (GRAS),” and (poly)phenol can impact biological entities such as cells, organs, and organisms. The health effects of (poly)phenols ultimately depend upon dose intake according to the age of the consumer [30]. Commercially, several products rich in (poly)phenols are manufactured by many industries; and the recommended isoflavones consumption rate is 50 mg/day, and the consumption of grape seed extract rich in proanthocyanins is 100–300 mg/day. Additionally, some authors have stated several aspects about the intake of higher concentrations of (poly)phenolic compounds that show the impact on the different biochemical processes, leading to side effects [30]. Excessive (poly)phenolic compound consumption is linked with nephrotoxicity and hepatotoxicity, and they can cause mutation to cells that may cause cancer or negatively impact the regulation of the thyroid hormone [31]. The consumption of (poly)phenolic compounds inhibits the engagement of nonheme iron, resulting in the reduction in microelements in populations at risk due to higher consumption of tea. Quercetin enhances the redox cycling of oestradiol-induced tumorigenesis and catechol estrogens.
2.3.1. Effect of Temperature on (Poly)phenols
The temperature has a great influence on the processing and storage of (poly)phenolic-rich food products, and these (poly)phenolic compounds may undergo an epimerization process. To control this epimerization, the appropriate temperature is critical to maintaining the (poly)phenol levels as they were diminished by 20–21% after undergoing heating at 70 °C for 30 min [32]. To this point, the majority of epigallocatechin gallate and some associated catechins in green tea leaves are epimerized during the brewing process. The epimerization process reverses the stereochemistry of the bond that bridges the B- and C-rings and converts epigallocatechin gallate (EGCG) to gallocatechin gallate (GCG). Accordingly, a significant amount of epigallocatechin gallate consumed during the consumption of green tea is gallocatechin gallate. In another study, catechin was diminished up to 20% when it was brewed for 7 h at 98 °C, and it was stable at room temperature [17]. Moreover, some experimental results suggest that (poly)phenols can directly be affected by storage conditions, mainly due to oxidation, hydrolysis, and complexations. However, the (poly)phenol compound maintains a stable structure for a longer time, and it also suppresses the (poly)phenol oxidase enzyme activity at low temperatures (4 °C) [33].
2.3.2. Effect of pH on (Poly)phenols
pH is another factor that influences (poly)phenol stability in fruits and vegetables that experience changes in the chemical form of (poly)phenols, which is also a reason for color variation in (poly)phenols. In general, th (poly)phenols are more stable at a low pH, which also reflects on the absorption of (poly)phenols in the human digestive system. For example, the extract of millet seed coat remains stable at a pH of 6.5, and they are unstable at a pH of 10. Moreover, green tea catechins are stable when the pH is below 4 and unstable at a pH greater than 6 in an aqueous solution. The effects of temperature and pH on (poly)phenols are shown in Figure 5 [33].
Figure 5. Effect of temperature on the stability of plant-based (poly)phenolic components.
2.3.3. Effect of Oxygen on (Poly)phenols
In the presence of oxygen, (poly)phenolic contents can attain autooxidation, which is the major factor of (poly)phenols’ instability, and as a result of autooxidation, hydroperoxides and peroxides are formed. Moreover, autoxidation leads to oxidative degradation and a significant decline in the concentration and bioactivity of (poly)phenols [33][34]. This activity of a (poly)phenolic compound is primarily associated with the number of OH groups, molecular structures, the resonance effects, and the double-bond conjugation [34]. The imbalance between oxidative and reductive processes is caused by enzymatic browning due to the presence of oxygen, and to overcome this problem the application of vacuum conditions or a modified atmosphere (N2 or CO2) is recommended [35]. Furthermore, it has been also reported that (poly)phenolic components promote oxidative damage to DNA, lipids, and deoxyribose in the presence of bivalent metallic components. These effects are suspected to result from the autoxidation process and have also been suggested to induce mutagenesis, carcinogenesis, or the promotion of cancer [33][34][35]. Furthermore, the consumption of food rich in (poly)phenolic compounds leads to the generation of substantial amounts of H2O2 [34][35]. Figure 6 proposes a possible mechanism of the autoxidation of the (poly)phenolic compounds.
Figure 6. Proposed mechanism of autoxidation of (poly)phenolic components.
2.3.4. Effect of Light on (Poly)phenols
Another reason for (poly)phenol degradation is the influence of light; uncontrolled light can cause (poly)phenol isomerization, i.e., the effects of bathochromic and hyperchromic shifts can cause the degradation of (poly)phenols by UV light [36]. The light affects the changes in the structure of (poly)phenols, and to avoid this degradation the extracted (poly)phenols are stored under dark conditions.
3. Milk Proteins
Protein-(poly)phenol interactions are linked to protein surface properties, and protein conformation is just as crucial as (poly)phenol structure in determining the type of the binding reaction. However, a broad selection of existing ingredients such as carbohydrates, fats, and proteins is being promoted for several industrial applications. Additionally, milk proteins have a higher nutritional value and also exceptional physicochemical properties and due to this, they are used as primary functional components in many foods. Additionally, several forms of milk proteins are commercially available such as caseins, caseinates, milk protein concentrates (MPCs), whey protein isolates (WPIs), and whey protein concentrate (WPCs), which are produced from milk products. MPCs are directly prepared using diafiltration or ultrafiltration methods on skim milk [37]. Milk protein that precipitates the solution under the isoelectric pH 4.6 at 30 °C is known as casein. In milk proteins, caseins have an amorphous structure and high proline content. A(s1)-casein, α(s2)-casein, β-casein, and kappa-casein are prime fractions, and hydrophobic interactions, hydrogen bonding, and calcium phosphate bridge them together to form casein micelles [38]. Moreover, caseins are used as carriers for the direct delivery of several bioactive compounds, and their physicochemical and structural properties enable them to serve in body delivery systems.
In addition, casein micelles contain many hydrophobic- and hydrophilic-bound bioactive compounds and metallic ions. It also exerts excellent self-assembling, surface properties, and gelation properties that make the interaction of other macromolecules form a complex structure with distinctive properties, which are important for protecting sensitive payload [9][10][11]. Moreover, the combination of extracted casein with a sodium molecule resulted in sodium caseinate, which is a multifunctional milk protein. In comparison with other types of caseinates, sodium caseinate has a higher protein content and is the most water-soluble [10]. Caseins exhibit good compatibility with other proteins and ligands due to suitable open structures and high hydrophobic areas [37][38]. Whey proteins, also known as serum proteins, are globular proteins that contribute 20% of the total protein in bovine milk and practically all of the protein in whey. They are complex-structured proteins with a high level of secondary and tertiary protein structure [9][10][11]. In addition, the by-products of cheese production are whey proteins, and these proteins are disposed of as waste, which increases environmental and food sustainability issues. To avoid these issues, the utilization of whey proteins from food waste to prepare beneficial products using different separation technologies could be a better approach. From the nutritional perspective, whey protein hydrolysates (WPHs) are well absorbed and digested in the gastrointestinal tract [39]. The addition of (poly)phenols can influence the functional properties of whey proteins. The solubility, foam stability, and foam capability are improved when chlorogenic acid interacts with the whey proteins [40]. The formation of a complex between whey proteins and cinnamon can terminate the production of the tumor necrosis factor (TNF-α) [41].
3.1. Interaction of Milk Proteins with (Poly)phenols
Milk proteins are extensively accessible, low-cost, natural raw materials with high nutritional value and good sensory attributes [42]. These milk proteins can bind with various kinds of molecules with different degrees of affinity due to their hydrophobic sites. The various forces of interaction such as hydrogen bonds, ionic, hydrophobic interactions, and van der Waals forces (as shown in Figure 7 and Table 1) play a significant role in the binding of milk proteins with different types of (poly)phenolic components [4]. Furthermore, in non-covalent binding, the hydrophobic molecules are bounded through hydrogen bonding, and the binding sites are situated on the surface of the proteins. This mechanism is useful for the transport of hydrophobic forms of vitamins, fatty acids, or (poly)phenolic compounds. In this context, Yuksel et al. [43] characterized the binding interactions between milk protein (β-casein) and green tea flavonoids (catechin). In their study, isothermal titration calorimetry and fluorescent probe binding methods were used to evaluate binding interactions between milk proteins and green tea flavonoids. The results of the study showed decreases in the hydrophobic sites’ surfaces due to the presence of green tea flavonoids for all the casein and solid-non-fat concentrations. However, isothermal titration calorimetry confirmed the non-covalent bonding between β-casein and catechin. In covalent bonding, the hydrophobic substances are attached to free reactive functional groups on the surface or inner cavities of milk proteins [44]. Caseins have a strong binding affinity to interact with (poly)phenols and are also convenient for nanoencapsulation [18]. Functional properties such as solubility and the stability of milk proteins may change when they interact with macromolecules. To avoid these issues, succinylation is a good choice for the modification of proteins. By using this method, the milk proteins improve their chemical, functional, and biological properties [45]. Similarly, Kanakis et al. [46] conducted a study for the evaluation of the interaction between β-lactoglobulin and (poly)phenols (catechin, epicatechin, epigallocatechin, and epigallocatechin gallate) by using various techniques including molecular modeling and fluorescence spectroscopic methods CD and FTIR. Moreover, an effect of (poly)phenol complexation, binding constant, and (poly)phenol binding mode on β-lactoglobulin and the secondary structure was determined. Herein, the structural study confirmed the binding of β-lactoglobulin and (poly)phenols via both hydrophobic and hydrophilic interactions.
Figure 7. Different types of intermolecular and intramolecular interaction between protein molecules and plant-based (poly)phenolic components. Herein, (a) disulfide bonds function to stabilize the quaternary structure of milk proteins and (poly)phenols, (b) hydrogen bonds provide most of the directional interaction that underpins milk proteins folding with (poly)phenols, and (c) ionic bonds are potent electrostatic attractions; therefore, they form as atoms of amino acids bearing opposite electrical charges, (d) hydrophobic interactions allow the milk protein surface to decrease and also reduce the undesirable interaction between (poly)phenols.
Table 1. Milk protein concentrates and their interactions with (poly)phenols.
| Milk Protein Concentrates |
(Poly)phenols |
Type of Interaction |
References |
| β-lactoglobulin |
Tea (poly)phenols (catechin, epicatechin, epigallocatechin and epigallocatechin gallate) |
Hydrophobic and Hydrophilic |
[46] |
| Casein, whey proteins and β-lactoglobulin |
Cocoa (poly)phenols (catechin and epicatechin) |
Non-covalent bonding |
[47] |
| Casien micelles and whey proteins |
Black tea and green the (poly)phenols (catechin) |
Hydrophobic |
[48] |
| β-casein, α-casein, κ-casein, and whey protein |
Coffee (poly)phenols (tannins) |
Hydrogen bonding |
[49] |
| α-caseins and β-caseins |
Antioxidant (poly)phenols (resveratrol, genistein, and curcumin) |
Hydrophilic and Hydrophobic |
[50] |
| β-casein |
Green tea (poly)phenols (catechin) |
Hydrophobic, and non-covalent bonding |
[43] |
| Casein and whey proteins |
Green tea, grapes, and cranberry (poly)phenols (catechin, tannic acid, homovanillic acid, and hesperetin) |
Hydrophobic |
[51] |
3.1.1. Non-Covalent Interaction between Milk Proteins and (Poly)phenols
Non-covalent interactions are mostly reversible reactions between proteins and (poly)phenols, and they are weaker than their covalent counterparts [46]. Generally, hydrophobic interactions and hydrogen bonding are principally involved in the interaction between milk proteins and (poly)phenols. The phenolic groups are known as good donors of hydrogen and form hydrogen bonds with carbon-oxygen groups of proteins [47]. Hydrogen bonds may form when the interaction takes place between OH groups of (poly)phenols and O2 or N2, specifically OH and NH2 groups of proteins [38]. The interaction between caseins and catechins can occur through residues of amino acid chains by hydrogen bonds and hydrophobic interactions [48]. Several amino acids such as glycine, valine, tyrosine, isoleucine, leucine, cysteine, phenylalanine, alanine, tryptophan, and methionine residues of proteins are considered hydrophobic amino acids sites that interact with non-polar aromatic rings of (poly)phenolic compounds [49]. The ionic bonds play a small role in the interaction of positively charged lysine and amino acid reacts with negatively charged OH groups of (poly)phenols. The non-covalent interactions between milk proteins and (poly)phenols play a key role in improving the functionality and quality of food products.
3.1.2. Covalent Interaction between Milk Proteins and (Poly)phenol
The covalent interactions between proteins and (poly)phenols usually occur through C-N or C-S bonding. One of the most common non-enzymatic methods used for the conjugation of protein (poly)phenol interaction is known as the alkaline reaction [50]. Under alkaline conditions, (poly)phenols are prone to oxidize at a pH range of 9 in the presence of O2. These (poly)phenols are converted into semi-quinone radicals, and then they again change into quinones. These intermediate products can readily react with the amino acid residues in the protein side chains. The reaction between proteins and (poly)phenols can be formed by covalent cross-linkage [51].
4. Functional Properties of (Poly)phenol–Milk Protein Complexes
The (poly)phenolic compounds and protein molecules show their functional properties. The formation of milk protein-(poly)phenolic complexes exhibits unique and multi-functional characteristics. These complexes show several functional properties such as gelling, solubility, thermal stability, and changes in the functional properties of the representative protein-(poly)phenolic complexes are concise.
4.1. Solubility
The solubility of protein is a significant property for assessing many functionalities of protein molecules as the insoluble protein cannot be used as a suitable ingredient for food product manufacturing. The complex of milk proteins and (poly)phenols could either increase or decrease the water solubility properties of proteins, which is dependent on the nature of the complex formation. Furthermore, interaction can influence the surface charge of the protein molecule, which can also change the isoelectric point, and this variation leads to changes in the pH and solubility properties of the complexes [51]. Furthermore, the interaction of non-polar (poly)phenolic compounds with the proteins increases the surface hydrophobicity of protein molecules by reducing the water solubility property [49]. It has been reported that when the milk proteins interact with chlorogenic acid non-covalently, the protein solubility of whey protein isolate and casein increases [40]. Moreover, at pH ≥ 8, there is a decrease in the solubility of lysozyme in the presence of chlorogenic acid in the milk protein. Therefore, the solubility property of (poly)phenol–protein complexes are highly influenced by the type of protein molecule and the type and structure of (poly)phenols and pH.
4.2. Thermal Stability
Thermal stability is another key property in the formation of (poly)phenol–milk proteins complexes. There is an improvement in thermal stability for globular proteins through the preparation of (poly)phenol–milk protein complexes. Enthalpy changes occur during the complex formation between milk proteins and (poly)phenolic compounds. At pH 7.4, the interaction of ferulic acid with bovine serum albumin (BSA) exhibits an increase in the melting temperature of native BSA. This shows that the binding of ferulic acid increases the thermal stability of serum albumin protein [52]. However, the interaction of chlorogenic acid and epigallocatechin gallate with lactoferrin can prevent the thermal assembling of lactoferrin at neutral pH [53].
4.3. Gelation
Several plants (poly)phenolic compounds can interact with protein molecules for the formation of complexes and can be converted into a gel-like structure with significantly enhanced properties. When the gels are formed by covalent interactions, they become are firmer and thermally stable. The major protein in whey is β-lactoglobulin, and its primary gelling agent dominates the thermal behavior of the total whey protein system. In addition, β-lactoglobulin modified by green tea (poly)phenols exhibited an increased gelation property when the gelling temperature and gelling time were decreased. The formation of the tea (poly)phenol–whey protein complex affected the rheological properties of the gels [54]. The formation of the (poly)phenol–milk protein complexes under covalent interactions can produce the enhanced gelation properties of the complexes.
5. Factors Affecting Binding Interactions between (Poly)phenols and Protein Complexes2. Czynniki wpływające na interakcje wiązania między (poli)fenolami a kompleksami białkowymi
The formation of protein-phenolic complexes may have a significant influence on protein structure, solubility, hydrophobicity, thermal stability, and the isoelectric point, and some environmental and food processing conditions such as ionic strength, pH, temperature, and others can affect the interaction between (poly)phenols and milk protein complexes [49]. The type of protein complex and the structure of (poly)phenols are also primary factors that can affect the binding interactions of (poly)phenol–protein complexes [46].Tworzenie kompleksów białkowo-fenolowych może mieć istotny wpływ na strukturę białka, rozpuszczalność, hydrofobowość, stabilność termiczną i punkt izoelektryczny, a niektóre warunki środowiskowe i przetwarzania żywności, takie jak siła jonowa, pH, temperatura i inne mogą wpływać na interakcję między (poli)fenolami a kompleksami białek mleka [49]. Rodzaj kompleksu białkowego i budowa (poli)fenoli są również głównymi czynnikami, które mogą wpływać na interakcje wiążące kompleksów (poli)fenol–białko [46].
5.1. Ionic Strength and pH2.1. Siła jonowa i pH
The pH-dependent changes in binding affinity and the characteristics of (poly)phenols seem to be directly associated with the structural variations of protein molecules during pH changes, indicating an indirect influence on milk protein-(poly)phenol interactions. Several reports revealed that the interaction of (poly)phenols with milk proteins is affected by the pH. At a low pH level, chlorogenic acids were bound to bovine serum albumin (BSA) without any changes in the binding affinity. So, it was confirmed that there was no effect on binding interactions when the pH value ranged from 3–7. However, a lack of available binding sites for chlorogenic acid and ferulic acid may change the tertiary structures of BSA at a very low pH [10]. Moreover, (poly)phenols exhibit a significant interaction with proteins with an isoelectric point for the interaction [55]. The binding affinity and (poly)phenol attributes that appear to be associated with the conformational changes of proteins undergoing the pH change, show the indirect effect on the interaction of (poly)phenol–proteins [49].Zależne od pH zmiany powinowactwa wiązania i właściwości (poli)fenoli wydają się być bezpośrednio związane ze zmianami strukturalnymi cząsteczek białka podczas zmian pH, co wskazuje na pośredni wpływ na interakcje białka mleka z (poli)fenolem. Kilka raportów ujawniło, że na interakcję (poli)fenoli z białkami mleka wpływa pH. Przy niskim poziomie pH kwasy chlorogenowe wiązały się z albuminą surowicy bydlęcej (BSA) bez żadnych zmian w powinowactwie wiązania. Potwierdzono więc brak wpływu na oddziaływania wiążące, gdy wartość pH wahała się w granicach 3–7. Jednak brak dostępnych miejsc wiązania dla kwasu chlorogenowego i ferulowego może zmienić trzeciorzędowe struktury BSA przy bardzo niskim pH [ 10]. Ponadto (poli)fenole wykazują istotne oddziaływanie z białkami z punktem izoelektrycznym dla oddziaływania [ 55 ]. Powinowactwo wiązania i cechy (poli)fenolu, które wydają się być związane ze zmianami konformacyjnymi białek podlegających zmianie pH, wykazują pośredni wpływ na oddziaływanie (poli)fenol–białka [ 49 ].
5.2. Temperature2.2. Temperatura
Temperature changes have been shown to influence protein phenolic interactions by causing structural changes in protein molecules as well as the solubility of the ligand. The impact of temperature on (poly)phenol–milk protein interaction may vary, which is highly dependent on the structure of the protein and the main driving force of binding [32]. Various heat treatment standards are commonly used in the dairy industry to produce numerous products. Similarly, whey protein denaturation in milk affects the techno-functional characteristics of dairy products. As a result, understanding the effects of temperature and the thermal denaturation of milk proteins on (poly)phenol binding is crucial, particularly for optimizing process conditions when (poly)phenol-rich dairy products are required [9]. The temperature may cause many structural changes in (poly)phenols as well as protein molecules [55]. The increase in temperature may cause the denaturation of bovine serum albumin and due to protein denaturation, the binding efficiency of proteins can be reduced; however, α-lactalbumin did not show changes in the binding sites after denaturation. Furthermore, at high temperatures, the hydrophobic binding sites are available due to the unfolding of the protein, showing the greater binding levels of EGCG on the surface of bovine albumin serum (BSA). During preheating, α-lactalbumin exhibits significant interaction with EGCG when compared to the original state of αlactalbumin. After heat denaturation, the surface area of BSA is decreased. The binding of quercetin and chlorogenic acid with BSA shows weak binding due to the polymerization of the bovine serum albumin protein molecule. Additionally, the denatured α-lactalbumin can bind with chlorogenic acid at a greater affinity due to the availability of the exposed residues of amino acids [10]. Therefore, the temperature effect on the interactions of (poly)phenols with milk proteins may be different and depends upon the structure and binding of the compounds.Wykazano, że zmiany temperatury wpływają na interakcje fenolowe białek, powodując zmiany strukturalne w cząsteczkach białka, a także rozpuszczalność ligandu. Wpływ temperatury na interakcję (poli)fenol-białko mleka może być różny, co w dużym stopniu zależy od struktury białka i głównej siły napędowej wiązania [ 32 ]. Różne standardy obróbki cieplnej są powszechnie stosowane w przemyśle mleczarskim do wytwarzania wielu produktów. Podobnie denaturacja białek serwatkowych w mleku wpływa na technologiczno-funkcjonalne cechy produktów mlecznych. W rezultacie zrozumienie wpływu temperatury i denaturacji termicznej białek mleka na wiązanie (poli)fenolu ma kluczowe znaczenie, szczególnie dla optymalizacji warunków procesu, gdy wymagane są produkty mleczne bogate w (poli)fenol [ 9]. Temperatura może powodować wiele zmian strukturalnych w (poli)fenolach, a także cząsteczkach białek [ 55]. Wzrost temperatury może powodować denaturację albuminy surowicy bydlęcej, a ze względu na denaturację białek, wydajność wiązania białek może być zmniejszona; jednakże α-laktoalbumina nie wykazywała zmian w miejscach wiązania po denaturacji. Co więcej, w wysokich temperaturach hydrofobowe miejsca wiązania są dostępne dzięki rozfałdowaniu białka, wykazując wyższe poziomy wiązania EGCG na powierzchni surowicy albuminy bydlęcej (BSA). Podczas podgrzewania α-laktoalbumina wykazuje znaczącą interakcję z EGCG w porównaniu z pierwotnym stanem α-laktoalbuminy. Po denaturacji cieplnej zmniejsza się powierzchnia BSA. Wiązanie kwercetyny i kwasu chlorogenowego z BSA wykazuje słabe wiązanie z powodu polimeryzacji cząsteczki białka albuminy surowicy bydlęcej. Dodatkowo,10 ]. Dlatego też wpływ temperatury na interakcje (poli)fenoli z białkami mleka może być różny i zależy od struktury i wiązania związków.
5.3. Type of Protein Complex2.3. Rodzaj kompleksu białkowego
During the interactions of (poly)phenol with protein and for the formation of complexes, the surface property of milk proteins plays a vital role. Naturally, the amorphous nature of proteins indicates they may have a higher affinity than structured proteins or globular proteins; however, the BSA consists of binding sites for (poly)phenolic compounds even with the globular structure. Furthermore, in BSA, the composition of amino acids, especially proline and prolyl residues, plays a prominent role in the binding properties of proteins with phenolic compounds [38]. The existence of the massive orientation of amino acids in a globular position may reduce the binding of phenolic compounds, which leads to the low accessibility of (poly)phenols for the protein molecule. The high proline residues of milk casein proteins are treated as a unique vehicle for phenolic compounds. Due to similar molecular weight, net charges, and size, casein fractions are useful for different functional properties. At lower concentrations, β-caseins can form reversible micelles. Epigallocatechin gallate exhibits a greater affinity for β-caseins than other proteins such as lysozyme, ovalbumin, α-lactalbumin, β-lactoglobulin, and gelatin. The binding of genistein and resveratrol on casein proteins such as α-casein and β-casein showed the variations for each casein fraction, and the stability of the β-casein with flavonoid is higher than that with αcasein [38]. Generally, β-casein shows a higher affinity than α-casein due to the presence of higher proline repeats and proline content in the composition of amino acids and the higher hydrophobic nature of β-casein [56]. Additionally, proteins with higher molecular weight may show a higher affinity for (poly)phenolic compounds.Podczas oddziaływań (poli)fenolu z białkiem i tworzenia kompleksów istotną rolę odgrywa właściwość powierzchni białek mleka. Naturalnie amorficzna natura białek wskazuje, że mogą one mieć wyższe powinowactwo niż białka strukturyzowane lub białka globularne; jednak BSA składa się z miejsc wiązania dla związków (poli)fenolowych, nawet o strukturze kulistej. Ponadto w BSA skład aminokwasów, zwłaszcza reszt proliny i prolilu, odgrywa znaczącą rolę we właściwościach wiązania białek ze związkami fenolowymi [ 38].]. Istnienie masywnej orientacji aminokwasów w pozycji globularnej może zmniejszać wiązanie związków fenolowych, co prowadzi do niskiej dostępności (poli)fenoli dla cząsteczki białka. Wysokoprolinowe pozostałości białek kazeiny mleka są traktowane jako unikalne podłoże dla związków fenolowych. Ze względu na podobną masę cząsteczkową, ładunki netto i wielkość, frakcje kazeiny są przydatne dla różnych właściwości funkcjonalnych. W niższych stężeniach kazeiny β mogą tworzyć odwracalne micele. Galusan epigallokatechiny wykazuje większe powinowactwo do kazein β niż inne białka, takie jak lizozym, albumina jaja kurzego, α-laktoalbumina, β-laktoglobulina i żelatyna. Wiązanie genisteiny i resweratrolu z białkami kazeinowymi, takimi jak kazeina α i kazeina β, wykazywało zmienność dla każdej frakcji kazeiny,38 ]. Ogólnie rzecz biorąc, kazeina β wykazuje większe powinowactwo niż kazeina α ze względu na obecność większej liczby powtórzeń proliny i zawartości proliny w składzie aminokwasów oraz wyższy hydrofobowy charakter kazeiny β [ 56 ]. Dodatkowo białka o większej masie cząsteczkowej mogą wykazywać większe powinowactwo do związków (poli)fenolowych.
5.4. Structure of (Poly)phenolic Compound2.4. Struktura związku (poli)fenolowego
The binding properties and affinities of (poly)phenolic compounds to milk protein for the formation of complexes are affected by its (poly)phenolic nature and its structure. These (poly)phenols differ in hydrophobicity, hydroxylation, glycosylation, methylation, molecular weight, and flexibility, and these properties all play an important role in the formation of (poly)phenol and protein complexes [57]. According to several studies, the binding affinity of phenolic compounds increases with an increase in the molecular weight of (poly)phenols [56]. Compared with the polyglycoside forms of flavonoids, monoglycoside forms exhibit a strong binding affinity for milk proteins. When the process of hydroxylation on the C-ring of flavonoids is increased then it shows higher binding factors with bovine albumin serum (BSA). This shows the importance of hydrogen bonds between flavonoids and BSA polar groups. There is an improvement in the binding of flavonoids due to the presence of the C2-C3 double bond, which helps the flavonoid to interact with buried sites of BSA. Due to the structural diversity of (poly)phenolic compounds and different substitution levels, as well as cis-trans isomerism, one has to consider the main factor of the formation of protein and (poly)phenolic complex studies. However, the structure of both (poly)phenol and protein molecules are key factors affecting the binding interactions.Na właściwości wiązania i powinowactwo związków (poli)fenolowych z białkiem mleka w celu tworzenia kompleksów ma wpływ ich charakter (poli)fenolowy i jego struktura. Te (poli)fenole różnią się hydrofobowością, hydroksylacją, glikozylacją, metylacją, masą cząsteczkową i elastycznością, a wszystkie te właściwości odgrywają ważną rolę w tworzeniu kompleksów (poli)fenolu i białka [ 57 ]. Według kilku badań powinowactwo wiązania związków fenolowych wzrasta wraz ze wzrostem masy cząsteczkowej (poli)fenoli [ 56]. W porównaniu z poliglikozydowymi formami flawonoidów, formy monoglikozydowe wykazują silne powinowactwo wiązania z białkami mleka. Gdy proces hydroksylacji na pierścieniu C flawonoidów jest zwiększony, wówczas wykazuje on wyższe czynniki wiążące z surowicą albuminy bydlęcej (BSA). Pokazuje to znaczenie wiązań wodorowych między flawonoidami a grupami polarnymi BSA. Występuje poprawa wiązania flawonoidów ze względu na obecność podwójnego wiązania C2-C3, które pomaga flawonoidowi w interakcji z ukrytymi miejscami BSA. Ze względu na zróżnicowanie strukturalne związków (poli)fenolowych i różne poziomy podstawienia, a także izomerię cis-trans, należy wziąć pod uwagę główny czynnik powstawania białek i kompleksów (poli)fenolowych. Jednakże,
6. Significances of Binding Reactions of Protein and (Poly)phenolic Complexes3. Znaczenie reakcji wiązania białek i kompleksów (poli)fenolowych
The binding of (poly)phenols on proteins may produce several results, with changes in the protein structures and also some of the functional, nutritional, and digestibility properties. While some proteins and the (poly)phenolic covalent interactions between them are rare to observe, the covalent interaction effects are more noticeable when compared to the noncovalent binding.Wiązanie (poli)fenoli z białkami może dawać kilka wyników, ze zmianami w strukturze białek, a także niektórymi właściwościami funkcjonalnymi, odżywczymi i strawnościowymi. Podczas gdy niektóre białka i (poli)fenolowe interakcje kowalencyjne między nimi są rzadko obserwowane, efekty interakcji kowalencyjnych są bardziej zauważalne w porównaniu z wiązaniem niekowalencyjnym.
Structural ChangesZmiany strukturalne
The binding of secondary or tertiary structures of proteins to small molecules can be analyzed by circular dichroism (CD) and Fourier transforms infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) techniques. Many studies discussed the effects of (poly)phenols on the structure of a protein. When bovine serum albumin (BSA) interacts with epicatechin, catechin, epicatechin gallate, and tannic acid, there is no change in the protein structure [58]. β-casein interacts with the quercetin without any protein structure changes. Additionally, the protein structure remains unchanged when β-lactoglobulin binds with naringenin and tannic acid [59]. When β-lactoglobulin binds with epigallocatechin gallate, there is a slight change in the secondary structure of a protein [60]. There is an influence on the structure and noncovalent interactions between BSA and flavonoids by quercetin and rutin, but the secondary structure of BSA remains stable. The interaction between β-lactoglobulin and catechins increases the structural stabilization of the protein with α-helix and β-sheet content. The interaction between the different types of flavonoids and BSA and the binding of epicatechin-3-gallate with protein changes the secondary structure of BSA and increases its α-helix content [61]. The changes in protein structures when they bind with the (poly)phenols are pH-dependent, and the interaction with the (poly)phenolic complexes at a pH range between 2.5 and 7.2; there is no change in the structure of β-lactoglobulin. The protein destabilization was reported with an increase in α-helix at a pH of 1.2 [62]. (Poly)phenolic concentration is an important factor that affects the protein structure after the binding reaction. No changes in the secondary structures of β-lactoglobulin occur when the double concentrations of EGCG react with protein. In the case of acidic pH, the effect of epigallocatechin gallate on a β-lactoglobulin structure is much less abundant. After binding EGCG with β-lactoglobulin, the change in the structure of the protein causes a slight increase in the α-helix structure [63]. The decrease in the β-sheet structure is due to an increase in turn in the structure that may cause the binding of resveratrol and curcumin with the incomplete destabilization of β-lactoglobulin [64]. A slight increase in the β-sheet and decrease in the αhelix structure of caseins are effects of binding α-casein and β-casein with (poly)phenols. There is no change in the structure of α-casein in the binding reaction [65]. The binding of two catechins and epicatechins with bovine serum albumin (BSA) shows a decrease in the β-sheet and an increase in α-helix structure. Significantly, the protein structural changes upon binding with (poly)phenols are not only functional properties but also binding reactions [66]. In noncovalent interactions, the structures of milk protein are modified. These changes are mostly influenced by pH and (poly)phenol concentration, which contrasts with the results of various studies. In noncovalent interactions, the structures of milk protein are modified. These changes are mostly influenced by pH and (poly)phenol concentration, which contrasts with the results of various studies.Wiązanie drugorzędowych lub trzeciorzędowych struktur białek z małymi cząsteczkami można analizować technikami dichroizmu kołowego (CD) i spektroskopii w podczerwieni z transformacją Fouriera (FTIR). W wielu badaniach omawiano wpływ (poli)fenoli na strukturę białka. Gdy albumina surowicy bydlęcej (BSA) wchodzi w interakcję z epikatechiną, katechiną, galusanem epikatechiny i kwasem garbnikowym, nie dochodzi do zmian w strukturze białka [ 58 ]. β-kazeina oddziałuje z kwercetyną bez żadnych zmian w strukturze białka. Dodatkowo struktura białka pozostaje niezmieniona, gdy β-laktoglobulina łączy się z naringeniną i kwasem garbnikowym [ 59 ]. Gdy β-laktoglobulina wiąże się z galusanu epigallokatechiny, następuje niewielka zmiana w drugorzędowej strukturze białka [ 60]. Kwercetyna i rutyna mają wpływ na strukturę i niekowalencyjne oddziaływania między BSA a flawonoidami, ale struktura drugorzędowa BSA pozostaje stabilna. Oddziaływanie między β-laktoglobuliną a katechinami zwiększa stabilizację strukturalną białka z zawartością α-helisy i β-kartki. Oddziaływanie pomiędzy różnymi typami flawonoidów i BSA oraz wiązanie 3-galusanu epikatechiny z białkiem zmienia strukturę drugorzędową BSA i zwiększa zawartość α-helisy [ 61]. Zmiany w strukturach białek, gdy wiążą się z (poli)fenolami, są zależne od pH, a interakcja z kompleksami (poli)fenolowymi w zakresie pH od 2,5 do 7,2; nie ma zmiany w strukturze β-laktoglobuliny. Destabilizację białka odnotowano wraz ze wzrostem α-helisy przy pH 1,2 [ 62 ]. Stężenie (poli)fenoli jest ważnym czynnikiem wpływającym na strukturę białka po reakcji wiązania. Brak zmian w strukturach drugorzędowych β-laktoglobuliny, gdy podwójne stężenia EGCG reagują z białkiem. W przypadku kwaśnego pH wpływ galusanu epigallokatechiny na strukturę β-laktoglobuliny jest znacznie mniejszy. Po związaniu EGCG z β-laktoglobuliną zmiana struktury białka powoduje nieznaczny wzrost struktury α-helisy [63 ]. Spadek struktury β-kartki wynika z kolei ze wzrostu struktury, co może powodować wiązanie resweratrolu i kurkuminy z niepełną destabilizacją β-laktoglobuliny [ 64 ]. Niewielki wzrost arkusza β i zmniejszenie struktury helisy α kazein to efekt wiązania kazeiny α i kazeiny β z (poli)fenolami. Nie ma zmiany w strukturze α-kazeiny w reakcji wiązania [ 65 ]. Wiązanie dwóch katechin i epikatechin z albuminą surowicy bydlęcej (BSA) wykazuje zmniejszenie β-kartki i wzrost struktury α-helisy. Co istotne, zmiany strukturalne białek po związaniu z (poli)fenolami to nie tylko właściwości funkcjonalne, ale także reakcje wiązania [ 66]. W oddziaływaniach niekowalencyjnych struktury białka mleka są modyfikowane. Na zmiany te największy wpływ ma pH i stężenie (poli)fenolu, co kontrastuje z wynikami różnych badań. W oddziaływaniach niekowalencyjnych struktury białka mleka są modyfikowane. Na zmiany te największy wpływ ma pH i stężenie (poli)fenolu, co kontrastuje z wynikami różnych badań.
7. Analysis of Protein and (Poly)phenolic Binding Interactions4. Analiza interakcji wiązania białek i (poli)fenoli
The binding of (poly)phenols with milk proteins has a significant effect on covalent and noncovalent interactions. Various technologies help to analyze the interaction of (poly)phenols with milk proteins by using some analytical methods. The overview of binding reactions between (poly)phenols and milk proteins including some methodologies used for the analysis of the binding interactions is given below.
74.1. Ultrafiltration
The evaluation of the protein-ligand binding uses direct and indirect methods that have been widely used since the 1970s. The direct method is used for measuring the complexes, and the indirect method is used for measuring the thermodynamic activity that occurred at the time of binding. The ultrafiltration method allows the fixing of free and bound ligands [38]. So, the ratio of molar binding is calculated by Equation (1)Do oceny wiązania białko-ligand wykorzystuje się metody bezpośrednie i pośrednie, które są szeroko stosowane od lat 70. XX wieku. Do pomiaru kompleksów stosuje się metodę bezpośrednią, a do pomiaru aktywności termodynamicznej, która wystąpiła w momencie wiązania, metodę pośrednią. Metoda ultrafiltracji pozwala na wiązanie wolnych i związanych ligandów [ 38 ]. Tak więc stosunek wiązania molowego oblicza się za pomocą równania (1)
where P is the ratio of molar binding.