Submitted Successfully!
To reward your contribution, here is a gift for you: A free trial for our video production service.
Thank you for your contribution! You can also upload a video entry or images related to this topic.
Version Summary Created by Modification Content Size Created at Operation
1 -- 2175 2025-01-18 06:13:38 |
2 format correct Meta information modification 2175 2025-01-20 02:01:07 |

Video Upload Options

We provide professional Video Production Services to translate complex research into visually appealing presentations. Would you like to try it?

Confirm

Are you sure to Delete?
Cite
If you have any further questions, please contact Encyclopedia Editorial Office.
Lecian, O.M. Comparisons of Generalized Schwarzschild Spacetimes in the Strong-Field Regime. Encyclopedia. Available online: https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/57745 (accessed on 14 February 2025).
Lecian OM. Comparisons of Generalized Schwarzschild Spacetimes in the Strong-Field Regime. Encyclopedia. Available at: https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/57745. Accessed February 14, 2025.
Lecian, Orchidea Maria. "Comparisons of Generalized Schwarzschild Spacetimes in the Strong-Field Regime" Encyclopedia, https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/57745 (accessed February 14, 2025).
Lecian, O.M. (2025, January 18). Comparisons of Generalized Schwarzschild Spacetimes in the Strong-Field Regime. In Encyclopedia. https://encyclopedia.pub/entry/57745
Lecian, Orchidea Maria. "Comparisons of Generalized Schwarzschild Spacetimes in the Strong-Field Regime." Encyclopedia. Web. 18 January, 2025.
Comparisons of Generalized Schwarzschild Spacetimes in the Strong-Field Regime
Edit

Some of the theorems about the line element of the blackhole spacetimes are reviewed. The foliation of the spacetimes is recalled. The comparison of ENBI gravity and that of massive gravity is achieved. The strong-field regime of blackhole objects is investigated.

Generalized Schwarzschild spacetimes Blackhole masses spacetime foliations

1. Introduction

Different blackhole solutions are compared. For this aim, the Theorems about blackhole spacetimes which allow for a generalization of the Schwarzschild black hole as are recalled. The structure of the spacetimes which allow the presence of Killing tensors are reviewed- as a result, the theoretical foundations of the comparison is set.

The comparison if the line elements is therefore possible, in order for the different addends to be identified. From [1], The Hawking-Page transition does not take place for the adS blackhole objects with Ricci-flat horizons and for the adS blackhole objects with Ricci hyperbolic horizons; this consideration motivates some of the studies here presented. The study of the experimental evidences about blackhole masses is further reviewed.

2. Introductory Material

2.1. Theorems about Blackhole Spacetimes

From [2], the blackhole object of generalised Schwarzschild gtt component of the line element as

on a slice Σ such that it is a t = 0 slice, with V > 0 on the slice Σ. The fundamental hypothesis is requested, that there exists a compact set k ⊂ Σ such that k ∼ Σ diffeomeorphic to R3¯B1(0), where ¯B1(0) is a closed spherical neighborhood centered at the origin: on Σ, the space components of the metric tensors are split as gij = δij + hij. Ibidem, the functional dependence of V on the coordinates is proven as

where

As a result, the added terms v in Eq. (2) isproven to be requested to be

The result of [3] is recalled, according to which the ij components of the metric tensor are

where aij is requested to be

In the present analysis, the Y value is chosen as the radial coordinate R, and the absolute-value specification becomes redundant.

Such blackhole objects are ibidem proven to be unique, i.e. the existence of 'multiple blackholes in an asymptotically-Euclidean static vacuum spacetimes is discarded. The uniqueness of static charged blackhole spacetimes was studied in [4]; there the work of [2] was specified for the space components of the metric tensor from Eq. (1) to be as

with the components of Eq. (2) unchanged. The hypotheses of [4] were refined from [5].

2.2. Non-Trivial Killing Tensors of Blackhole Spacetimes

In [6], non-trivial Killing tensors are reviewed, and their use in the definition of generalized photon surfaces is given.

In [7], a timelike hypersurface is newly defined in a way such that any worldline of a particle of mass m, electric charge q, electromagnetic potential Aµ and fixed total energy E which initially touches it is going to stay on the defied hypersurface forever.

Conditions for ’margianlly-stable’ orbits are ibidem found.

Ibidem, the kinetic energy Ekin and the potential energy Epot are introduced such that

The considered spacetimes are from [8] timelike outside the ergosphere as

The paradigm is apt for metrics obeying the Birkhoff Theorem. The total energy of a particle E considered is

The complete Killing maps of the normal component and of the tangent component was taken from [6][9].

2.3. The Colombeau Geometry for the Neighbourhood of the (Schwarzschild) Fictitious Singularity

In [10], the Colobeau theory is exposed as far as the definition of the distributional spacetimes, whose results, as well as those of the related items of bibliography, will be made use of in SCRIVI.

From [11], the physical interpretation of the ’distributional Schwarzschild geometry’ is explained.

From [10], in Remark 1.1.4, G(M′) is defined as the algebra of the Colombeau generalized functions M′ ⊂ M. ˜ R is the set of the Colombeau generalized numbers [12][13][14].

Let (gǫ)ǫ the Colombeau generalized metric tensor on M.

Rµν M′ is the generalized Ricci tensor on M; furthermore, as from [15][16],

Rµν M′(p) is the generalized Ricci tensor on M of the metric (gǫ(p))ǫ | M′.

There is a degenerate singular metric tensor from the Ricci tensor as

From Definition 1.1 ibidem, (G(M′)) is the algebra of Colombeau generalized functions on M′ ⊂ M.

The Colombeau distributional scalar curvature RM(p) is defined as

under the hypothesis

The 'distributional spacetime' of metric tensor (gµν ǫ(p))ǫ exhibits a singularity on a smooth compact submanifold MC ⊂ M iff RMc (p) ∈ G(MC\c(MC).

Furthermore, the distributional spacetime (gǫ(p))ǫ has a singularity with compact support iff RMc (p) ∈ D(R3).

2.4. The Generalized Photon Surfaces from the Killing Tensors

In [6], the definition of generalized photon surfaces of blackhole spacetimes is derived from the notion of non-trivial Killing tensors.

Massive-particle surfaces (MPS’s) are introduced in [7] as generalizations of the concepts developped in [17].

From [8], Conformal Killing Vectors (CKV’s) and Conformal Killing Tensors (CKT’s) are outlined for arbitrary null geodesics with affine parametrization.
Reducible CKT’s are recalled to be constructed from symmetrization procedures from [18][19].

The paradigm schematized in [7], the results of [17] are extended to the instance of massive charged particles.

In [17], generalization of the concept of photon sphere of a blackhole object is extended from that of the Schwarzschild spacetimes.

Photon surfaces are defined ibidem after energy conditions, i.e. they are defined as the surfaces (M,gµν) as ’immersed’, ’no-where-spacelike’ hypersurface S of
(M,gµν) such that, for all p point of S and for all kµ null vector in the tan gent space of S, TpS, there exists a null geodesics γ such that (−ξ,ξ) → M of (M,gµν) in the way defined as ˙ γ(0) = kµ, | γ |∈ S.

3. The EN-BI Gravitational Model

As recalled from [20] from [21], the action I is taken as

where R is the Ricci curvature, the negative cosmological-constant term λ is written as

f is a fixed symmetric tensor, the Faraday tensor Fµν ≡ ∂µAν − ∂νAµ is satu rated as F as

the polynomials Ui(g,f) are polynomials of the eigenvalues of of the tensor Kµν. The BI electrodynamics is defined after the Lagrangean density L(F) as

The fields equations are obtained as follows. Variation with respect to the metric tensor gµν lead to the EN-BIFE’s

with the tensor χµν as from [20]. The symmetric tensor fµν is here chosen as

being hij the pertaining line element of a chosen Euclidean space, and c and arbitrary constant. Variation with respect to the Faraday tensor Fµν leads to the equality

In [20], the spherically-symmetric non-rotating blackhole spacetime metric is chosen in an arbitrary number of dimensions as

where the symmetric tensor fµν from Eq. (18) has been specified to the 4 dimensional case, and for a Schwarzschild solid angle.

3.1. Some Limiting Processes in EN-BI Gravitational Model in the 4-Dimensional Case

The metric Eq. (20) is here specified in 4 spacetime dimensions for a spherically symmetric non-rotating blackhole spacetime endowed with a Schwarzschild solid angle element. The line element Eq. (20) therefore rewrites

The gtt function Eq. (20) is developped to

the constant m0 is an integration constant which is related to the blackhole mass (i.e. according to the chosen limit to the Nariai spacetimes), and the constant G is defined as related to the electric charge q as

In the present Section, a vanishing electric charge is assumed at the moment. The gtt component of the line element Eq. (20) is therefore reconducted to the following expression

4. Conformal Gravity Theories

In [22], Weyl theories of gravity [23][24][25][26][27][28] are compared as far as the components of the metric tensor are concerned with massive theories of gravities.

The chosen line element is one of static spherically-symmetric spacetimes with line element

with the component of the metric tensor hij as

In [29] and in [30], solutions of the EFE’s for the conformal transformation gµν → Ω2(x)gµν with Ω a non-singular function of the coordinates is reconducted to the expression

with the constants si and Λ. From [30], the Schwarzschild limit is recovered in the instance

From [31] and from [20], the comparisons are found

The Schwarzschild radius is found to define the parameter space of the model as

5. Comparisons of Blackhole Solutions

It is possible to confront EN-BI blackhole solutions, conformal-gravity blackhole solutions, and generalized Schwarzschild spacetimes blackhole solutions. The method of [22] is here newly developped. From Eq. 6 of [22]

Comparison of blackhole solution of conformal gravity and of massive gravity is based on the equality

5.1. Comparison with 4-dim Weyl Gravity

Compasion of the 4-dimensional Weyl gravity solutions and the chosen of the EN-BI gravitational blackhole spaceitmes are newly found after imposing

 The request is here posed

i.e.

The solution is looked for for M. To this aim, one remarks that the limit m → ∞ is well-posed in the case of asymptotical flatness and in the case k = 1. In the case of asymptotical flatness, the comparison is possible with the Kottler Schwarzschild-Kiselev spacetimes, as equality Eq. (35) is assured to be well posed because the Kottler-Schwarzschild Kiselev spacetimes obey the Birkhoff Theorem, as from [32].

6. The Preparation of Particle Fields Close to the Blackhole Fictitious Singularity in the Strong Field Regime

In [33], the preparation of particle fields close to the surface of a blackhole object is discussed.

The n-dimensional spacetimes with metric gαβ are considered, with a time-like killing vector k1alpha i considered, and electro-magnetic of covector Aα with the same symmetries as

For a worldline γ, the particle 4-position γα and the particle 4-velocity (rvelocity) ˙ γα are looked for. For these purposes, the total energy E is calculated, as well as the kinetic energy Ekin and the potential energy Epot: this way, the configuration of a particle is

Massive-particle surfaces (MPS’) are described in [7] and in [34], while hidden symmetries are investigated in [35] and in [36].

MPS' are described from [7] as (n − 1)-dimensional timelike hypersurfaces’exhibiting a space outer normal nα: any particle with fixed energy E, i.e. such

that the MP starts in S with initial velocity and remains in S always. It is translated as

Let κ be the ’projection of the time-like Killing vector onto S:

here, the Killing vector is hypothesized to be tangent to S as

i.e. the MP is defined to be ‘static'.

The connections between the surfaces and the hidden symmetries allows one to reconduct the shadow of the blackhole [37], where also interactions with plasma are considered.

6.1. The 4-Dimensional Models

A general static axisymmetric 4-dimensional spacetime is considered with line element

where the components of the metric tensor Eq. (41) are functions of the 4 dimensional variables r and θ.The time-like Killing vector kαα = ∂t implies

as

A MPS ansatz is taken from [33] that the particle surface is as

which is achieved with

The resulting energy E is found as a function of the mass of the particle µ as

At q =0, the conditions imply

The photon sphere is located at q=µ=0. The condition K=0 implies the total-umbilicity

The Schwarzs child black hole space time is defined as

Eq.’s(47a) imply for the energy E the definition

 with inner most stable orbit as

The equation of the photon surface is obtained from Eq. (50) as

Uniqueness theorems are presented in [38] and in [35].

6.2. Reissner-Nordstroem Spacetimes

Reissner-Nordstroem spacetimes are qualified after the components of the metric tensor

The energy E± is calculated as

The radius of the photon surface rps is calculated as

7. Cosmological Implementation

The cosmological implementation of the models is here presented from [39] also as far as the thermal history of the universe is concerned.

In [39], analysis of a'narrow atmospheric layer' in a suitably-chosen spherical neighborhood of the Astrophysical blackhole is considered. Applications can be considered to new explanation of the speed of growth of supermassive blackholes and related objects in the Early Universe [40][41][42][43]. Furthermore, an explanation of the low mass gap [44][45][46][47] in newly obtained.

7.1. Thefictitious Singularities of the Schwarzschild Metric

A regularized Schwarzschild radial variable is taken from [10][48] as rǫ as

at which the Ricci scalar is explained as one with a singular behaviour as

The non-smooth Colombeau regularization can also be chosen, i.e. as from [11] and from[49].

A thin spherical neighbourhood is chosen as

Isotropic coordinates are discussed in [50].

In isotropic coordinates, the line element is rewritten as

at ρ > rS with the definition of the new radial variable of the components of the metric tensor as

The Schwarzschild coordinates and the isotropic coordinates are transformed as

or

From [10][48], one has that the expression of the laspe function is retrieved as

The Schwarzschild fictitious singularity is located at

The photon sphere is situated at ρps as

Theradial part of the line element Eq. (59) is regular at the fictitious singularity; there appears physical singularities in the presence of matter fields as

The ingredients are ready for the analysis of the 't Hooft brick-wall model [51]: the exploration of the pscaetime at this layer, i.e.

in the strong field regime can be performed.

8. Discussion

More in detail, from [51], blackhole objects are commented to be treated as 'composite sysyems' of elementary particles.’ This analysis is to be reconducted to the notion of 'general coordinate transformation invariance: the task was stressed not to be achieved yet.

Results from foliated manifolds can be also used for the present purposes. From [35], the procedure is shown, for which it is possible to construct a non-trivial killing tensor of rank 2 on a foliated manifold of codimension 1. The non-trivial Killing tensors can also be 'lifted' from the slices to the entire manifold. As a result, from [52], the question can be examined, about whether there exist generalized photon surfaces in a spacetime with two killing vector fields.

 

References

  1. D. Birmingham, Topological black holes in Anti-de Sitter space, Class. Quant. Grav. 16, 1197 (1999) [hep-th/9808032].
  2. Bunting, G.L., Masood-ul-Alam, A.K.M., Nonexistence of multiple black holes in asymptotically Euclidean static vacuum space-time. Gen Relat Gravit 19, 147-154 (1987).
  3. Schoen, R. and Yau, S.-T. On the proof of the positive mass conjecture in general relativity (1979).Commun. Math. Phys.,65, 45-76.
  4. A K M Masood-ul-Alam, Uniqueness proof of static charged black holes revisited, 1992 Class. Quantum Grav. 9 L53
  5. P Ruback, A new uniqueness theorem for charged black holes, 1988 Class. Quantum Grav. 5 L155.
  6. K. Kobialko, I. Bogush, D. Gal’tsov, Killing tensors and photon surfaces in foliated spacetimes, Phys. Rev. D 104(4), 044009 (2021).
  7. K. Kobialko, I. Bogush, D. Gal’tsov, Geometry of massive particle surfaces, Phys. Rev. D 106, 084032 (2022), arXiv:2208.02690 [gr-qc].
  8. K. Kobialko, I. Bogush and D. Gal’tsov, Slice-reducible conformal Killing tensors, photon surfaces, and shadows, Phys. Rev. D 106, no.2, 024006 (2022) [arXiv:2202.09126 [gr-qc]].
  9. K. V. Kobialko, D. V. Gal’tsov, Photon regions and umbilic conditions in stationary axisymmetric spacetimes: Photon Regions, Eur. Phys. J. C 80, p. 527 (2020).
  10. J. Foukzon, A. Potapov and E. Menkova, Was Polchinski wrong? Colombeau distributional Rindler space-time with distributional LeviCivit´ a connection induced vacuum dominance. Unruh effect revisited, JHEPGC 4 (2018) 361,
  11. J. Foukzon, E. Men’kova, A. Potapov, (2024). Singular general relativity using the Colombeau approach. I. Distributional Schwarzschild geometry from nonsmooth regularization via horizon. Researchgate, Berlin, Germany (2024).
  12. Colombeau, J.F. (1984) New Generalized Functions and Multiplication of Distributions. North Holland, Amsterdam.
  13. Parker, P.E. (1979) Distributional Geometry. Journal of Mathematical Physics , 20, 1423.
  14. Vickers, J.A., Wilson, J.P. (1998) A Nonlinear Theory of Tensor Distributions. gr-qc/9807068.
  15. J.A. Vickers, Distributional Geometry in General Relativity. Journal of Geometry and Physics 62, 692-705 (2012).
  16. R. Steinbauer, Nonlinear Distributional Geometry and General Relativity, Contribution to Proceedings of the International Conference on Generalized Functions. ICGF, Guadeloupe (2000).
  17. C.M. Claudel, K.S. Virbhadra, G.F.R. Ellis, The Geometry of photon surfaces, J. Math. Phys. 42, 818-838 (2001) [arXiv:gr-qc/0005050 [gr-qc]].
  18. M. Walker and R. Penrose, On quadratic first integrals of the geodesic equations for type { 22} spacetimes, Commun. Math. Phys. 18, 265-274 (1970)
  19. R. Rani, S. B. Edgar and A. Barnes, Killing tensors and conformal Killing tensors from conformal Killing vectors, Class. Quant. Grav. 20, 1929-1942 (2003) [arXiv:gr-qc/0301059 [gr-qc]].
  20. S. H. Hendi, B. Eslam Panah, S. Panahiyan, Einstein-Born-Infeld-massive gravity: adS-black hole solutions and their thermodynamical properties, JHEP. 11, 157 (2015) [arXiv:1508.01311].
  21. R.G. Cai, Y.P. Hu, Q.Y. Pan et al., Thermodynamics of black holes in massive gravity, Phys. Rev. D 91, 024032 (2015).
  22. B. Eslam Panah, S. H. Hendi, Black hole solutions correspondence between conformal and massive theories of gravity, EPL 125, 60006 (2019) [1904.07670].
  23. F. Englert, C. Truffin, R. Gastmans, Conformal invariance in quantum gravity, Nucl. Phys. B 117, 407 (1976).
  24. J.V. Narlikar, A.K. Kembhavi, A nonsingular rotating black hole, Lett. N. Cim. 19, 517 (1977).
  25. R.J. Riegert, Birkhoff’s Theorem in Conformal Gravity, Phys. Rev. Lett. 53, 315 (1984).
  26. J. Maldacena, Einstein Gravity from Conformal Gravity, e-print [arXiv:1105.5632].
  27. H. Lue, C.N. Pope, Critical Gravity in Four Dimensions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 181302 (2011).
  28. I. Bars, P. Steinhardt, N. Turok, Local Conformal Symmetry in Physics and Cosmology, Phys. Rev. D 89, 043515 (2014).
  29. D. Klemm, Topological black holes in Weyl conformal gravity, Class. Quant. Grav. 15, 3195 (1998).
  30. P. D. Mannheim, D. Kazanas, Solutions to the Reissner-Nordstroem, Kerr, and Kerr-Newman problems in fourth-order conformal Weyl gravity, Phys. Rev. D 44, 417 (1991).
  31. R.-G. Cai, Y.-P. Hu, Q.-Y. Pan, Y.-L. Zhang, Thermodynamics of black holes in massive gravity, Phys. Rev. D 91, 024032 (2015) [arXiv:1409.2369].
  32. O.M. Lecian, Generalized Schwarzschild Spacetimes with a Linear Term and a Cosmological Constant, Universe 2024, 10(11), 408.
  33. I. Bogush, K. Kobialko, D. Gal’tsov, Constructing massive particles surfaces in static spacetimes, e-print arXiv:2402.03266.
  34. Y. Song, C. Zhang, Quasi-local studies of the particle surfaces and their stability in general spacetimes, Eur. Phys. J. C 83, 50 (2023), arXiv:2208.03661 [gr-qc].
  35. K. Kobialko, I. Bogush, D Gal’tsov, Killing tensors and photon surfaces in foliated spacetimes, Phys. Rev. D 104, 044009 (2021), arXiv:2104.02167 [gr-qc].
  36. K. Kobialko, I. Bogush, and Dmitri Gal’tsov, Slicereducible conformal Killing tensors, photon surfaces, and shadows, Phys. Rev. D 106, 024006 (2022), arXiv:2202.09126 [gr-qc].
  37. K. Kobialko, I. Bogush, D. Gal’tsov, Black hole shadows of massive particles and photons in plasma, Phys. Rev. D 109, 024060 (2024), arXiv:2312.07498 [gr-qc].
  38. C. Cederbaum, G.J. Galloway, Uniqueness of photon spheres in electro-vacuum spacetimes, Class. Quant. Grav. 33, 075006 (2016), arXiv:1508.00355 [math.DG].
  39. M. Gogberashvili A.S. Sakharov, Black Holes and Baryon Number Violation: Unveiling the Originsof Early Galaxies and the Low-Mass Gap, Galaxies 2025, 13(1), 4; https://doi.org/10.3390/galaxies13010004
  40. I. Labbe, et al. A population of red candidate massive galaxies ∼ 600 Myr after the big bang, Nature 616 (2023) 266, doi: 10.1038/s41586-023-05786-2 [arXiv: 2207.12446 [astro-ph.GA]].
  41. Y. Harikane, et al. A Comprehensive study of galaxies at z ∼ 9 − 16 found in the early JWST data: Ultraviolet luminosity functions and cosmic star formation history at the prereionization epoch, Astrophys. J. Suppl. 265 (2023) 5, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/acaaa9 [arXiv: 2208.01612 [astroph.GA]].
  42. R. Maiolino, et al., JADES. The diverse population of infant black holes at 4 < z <11: Merging, tiny, poor, but mighty, [arXiv: 2308.01230 [astroph.GA]].
  43. J. E. Greene, et al. UNCOVER spectroscopy confirms the surprising ubiquity of active galactic nuclei in red sources at z > 5, Astrophys. J. 941 (2022) 106.
  44. C.D. Bailyn, R.K. Jain, P. Coppi, J.A. Orosz, The Mass distribution of stellar black holes, Astrophys. J. 499 (1998) 367.[astro-ph]].
  45. F. Ozel, D. Psaltis, R. Narayan, J.E. McClintock, The Black hole mass distribution in the galaxy, Astrophys. J. 725 (2010) 1918,
  46. W. M. Farr, N. Sravan, A. Cantrell, L. Kreidberg, C. D. Bailyn, I. Mandel and V. Kalogera, The Mass distribution of stellar-mass black holes, Astrophys. J. 741 (2011) 103.
  47. K. Belczynski, G. Wiktorowicz, C. Fryer, D. Holz and V. Kalogera, Missing Black Holes unveil the supernova explosion mechanism, Astrophys. J. 757 (2012) 91.
  48. J. Foukzon, E. R. Men’kova, A. A. Potapov and S. A. Podosenov, Was Polchinski wrong? Colombeau distributional Rindler space-time with distributional Levi-Civit´a connection induced vacuum dominance. Unruh effect revisited, J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 1141 (2018) 012100.
  49. J. Foukzon, Distributional Schwarzschild Geometry from Non Smooth Regularization Via Horizon, 2008 British Journal of Mathematics & Computer Science 11(1).
  50. R. M. Wald, General Relativity (University of Chicago Press, Chicago 1984).
  51. G. ’t Hooft, On the quantum structure of a black hole, Nucl. Phys. B 256, 727 (1985).
  52. V. Frolov, P. Krtous, D. Kubiznak, Black holes, hidden symmetries, and complete integrability, Living Rev. Rel. 20, no.1, 6 (2017) [arXiv:1705.05482 [gr-qc]].
More
Information
Contributor MDPI registered users' name will be linked to their SciProfiles pages. To register with us, please refer to https://www.encyclopedia.pub/register :
View Times: 539
Revisions: 2 times (View History)
Update Date: 20 Jan 2025
1000/1000
Video Production Service